Jun 25
Doing a disservice to Service Dogs
A recent Los Angeles Times article draws attention to a new amendment to the NYPD Patrol Guide which has expanded the definition of service animals to include those animals that assist people with epilepsy, heart disease, lung disease and other conditions, including mental disorders - in addition to seeing-eye dogs.
As assistants to people with disabilities, service animals are granted all types of access that normal pets are not…to restaurants, stores, public transportation - access that most pet owners would love to have. So, does this broader definition of a service animal make it easier for people to fraudulently pass off their pets as service animals? Of course.
Now personally, I firmly believe that if you take advantage of laws that were created to help people with disabilities by pretending that your dog is a service animal, you are banking a BOATLOAD of negative karma. But I know that some people think…what’s the harm in bending the rules a little if my dog is trained and well-behaved??
My husband feels that Oscar should be granted special privileges because he’s a therapy dog (NOTE: Therapy dogs are not granted ANY special privileges). Yes, it’s true that he went through pretty extensive training and is very well-behaved and it would be much more convenient for us if we could bring Oscar wherever we wanted - but we don’t NEED to bring him everywhere with us to be able to effectively function in society.
The problem is that taking advantage of the privileges that are granted to service animals, like Adele, undermines the laws that exist to help people with disabilities.
I think it’s terrific that authorities are acknowledging that service animals extend far beyond traditional service dogs for the blind. Maybe service animals need some kind of animal version of the handicapped parking permit…something to identify them as legitimate service animals that can only be issued to owners with disabilities.
What do you think?




